BARECO OIL CO. v. ALEXANDER

No. 16.

33 F.Supp. 32 (1940)

BARECO OIL CO. v. ALEXANDER.

District Court, N. D. Iowa, Central Division.

May 7, 1940.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Price, Rider & Keefe, of Fort Dodge, Iowa, for plaintiff.

D. M. Kelleher, of Fort Dodge, Iowa, for defendant.


SCOTT, District Judge.

The above entitled cause comes up on a motion to dismiss on the ground that plaintiff's complaint does not affirmatively show jurisdiction of this Court for that the action is brought by Bareco Oil Company, alleged to be a successor in interest to Barnsdall Refining Corporation, which had by written contract constituted the defendant, Alexander, its agent, to conduct a branch of its oil business at Pocahontas, Iowa, and while it is alleged that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases