1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 35 F.Supp.
  5. 35 F.Supp. 29 (1940)
 

BROWN INSTRUMENT CO. v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.

Nos. 8478, 8506.

35 F.Supp. 29 (1940)

BROWN INSTRUMENT CO. v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. MINNEAPOLIS-HONEYWELL REGULATOR CO.

District Court, E. D. New York.

April 22, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cooper, Kerr & Dunham, of New York City (W. P. Bair and Will Freeman, both of Chicago, Ill., Thomas J. Byrne, of New York City, and George H. Fisher, of Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel), for Brown Instrument Co. and Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.

Fish, Richardson & Neave, of Boston, Mass., (Harrison F. Lyman and William R. Woodward, both of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for General Electric Co.

INCH, District Judge.

The above suits have been duly consolidated for trial and will be disposed of by one decision.

By the first suit the plaintiff, Brown Instrument Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company, has sued the General Electric Company, alleging that the Shafer patent U. S. No. 1,583,496 owned by the General Electric Company interferes with the Phelan-Hotchkiss patent U. S. Re-issue No. 19,235 owned by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases