1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 35 F.Supp.
  5. 35 F.Supp. 586 (1940)
 

B. B. CHEMICAL CO. v. CATARACT CHEMICAL CO.

No. 2218.

35 F.Supp. 586 (1940)

B. B. CHEMICAL CO. v. CATARACT CHEMICAL CO., Inc.

District Court, W. D. New York.

July 1, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Powers, of Buffalo, N.Y. (Fish, Richardson & Neave, Harrison F. Lyman, and Charles E. Hammett, Jr., all of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Albert R. Henry, of Buffalo, N. Y. (D. Rumsey Wheeler, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

In the memorandum decision made by me upon the re-hearing 35 F.Supp. 586, the statement appears "Nitrocellulose of a viscosity of 1100 to 1500 was known in the prior art." It is obvious the intention was to refer to the nitrocellulose solution "as being of the viscosity of 1100 to 1500 centipoise." I am making a change in the original memorandum on the re-hearing on file and making the proper endorsement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases