1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 32 F.Supp.
  5. 32 F.Supp. 588 (1940)
 

NACHOD & UNITED STATES S. CO. v. AUTOMATIC SIGNAL CORP.

No. 2712.

32 F.Supp. 588 (1940)

NACHOD & UNITED STATES SIGNAL CO., Inc., et al. v. AUTOMATIC SIGNAL CORPORATION et al.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

April 16, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Watson, Bristol, Johnson & Leavenworth, of New York City (David A. Woodcock, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Edwards, Bower & Pool and D. G. Angus, all of New York City, and J. Dwight Dana, of New Haven, Conn., for defendants.

HINCKS, District Judge.

On October 15, 1938, I entered two orders: (1) an order dismissing as to the Signal Corporation for lack of venue, and (2) an order dismissing the bill on the ground that the Signal Corporation was an indispensable party. The plaintiff never appealed from the order dismissing as to Signal; it did, however, appeal from the order dismissing for lack of an indispensable party and the Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, Nachod v. Engineering &...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases