IMPERATO v. LOWE

No. 449.

32 F.Supp. 563 (1940)

IMPERATO v. LOWE, Deputy Compensation Commissioner, et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

April 13, 1940.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John B. Coppola, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Harold M. Kennedy, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Morris K. Siegel, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel), for defendant Samuel S. Lowe, Deputy Commissioner.

Lord, Day & Lord, of New York City (Woodson D. Scott, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Commonwealth & Dominion Line, Limited.


CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This action was commenced on June 19th, 1939, to review an order of the Deputy Commissioner dated May 18th, 1939, denying plaintiff's application to reopen his claim.

The denial of the application to reopen was on the ground that the time within which such application could be made, under the provisions of Section 22 of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, Title 33, Section 922, U.S.Code, 33 U.S.C.A. § 922...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases