GOODMAN v. SUPER MOLD CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA

No. 8851.

109 F.2d 442 (1940)

GOODMAN v. SUPER MOLD CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 24, 1940.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Townsend and Roy C. Hackley, Jr., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Percy S. Webster and Roger B. Webster, both of Stockton, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.


WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Appellant has filed a petition for rehearing. In addition thereto he claims to have discovered an anticipating patent issued September 28, 1920 to A. R. Thompson, No. 1,354,227, for a tire mold. In order to take advantage of this discovery appellant presents the same to this court with affidavits purporting to show due diligence in the search of patent office records and that, notwithstanding such diligence, the Thompson patent was not discovered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases