NORRIS v. JONES

Nos. 57, 58.

31 F.Supp. 463 (1940)

NORRIS et al. v. JONES, Collector of Internal Revenue. NORRIS v. SAME.

District Court, W. D. Oklahoma.

January 26, 1940.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. A. Richardson, of Oklahoma City, Okl. (Hayes, Richardson, Shartel & Gilliland, of Oklahoma City, Okl., on the brief), for plaintiffs.

Carl J. Marold, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., of Washington, D. C. and Charles E. Dierker, U. S. Dist. Atty., of Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant.


VAUGHT, District Judge.

The facts in this case, to a very great extent, are stipulated by the parties and there is little conflict in the evidence introduced as to the real issues. However, the court is inclined to make a rather full statement in this opinion of the facts and contentions of the parties.

Cause Number 57 is an action by plaintiffs, P. A. Norris and Josephine Norris, for the recovery of $10,958.94 paid by them as a deficiency in federal income...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases