1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 31 F.Supp.
  5. 31 F.Supp. 451 (1940)
 

CHANDLER v. CUTLER-HAMMER, INC.

No. 5325.

31 F.Supp. 451 (1940)

CHANDLER et al. v. CUTLER-HAMMER, Inc.

District Court, E. D. Wisconsin.

February 12, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams, Bradbury, McCaleb & Hinkle, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Thiess, Olson & Mecklenburger, of Chicago, Ill., and Lecher, Michael, Whyte & Sopher, of Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant.

DUFFY, District Judge.

The complaint is by Chandler and Panish as joint plaintiffs, and alleges infringement by defendant of Chandler reissue patent No. 19,445. The defendant filed its answer and also a counter claim for a declaratory judgment, asking that Panish patent No. 1,747,594 be declared void. Defendant alleges that the plaintiffs have been notifying the trade, including the defendant, of the alleged infringement not only of the Chandler reissue patent, which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases