SCHIFRIN v. CHENILLE MFG. CO.


34 F.Supp. 400 (1940)

SCHIFRIN v. CHENILLE MFG. CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

June 4, 1940.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Meyer Schifrin, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Robert J. Blum, of New York City, for defendants.


CONGER, District Judge.

This is a motion to vacate a consent judgment on the ground that this court lacked jurisdiction over the defendants. The judgment was entered on a purported notice of appearance and a purported stipulation consenting to the judgment, both signed by one Abraham Aaron as "solicitor for defendants".

It now appears that Abraham Aaron is a registered patent attorney, a member of the bar of the District of Columbia, but that he has never...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases