1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 112 F.2d
  5. 112 F.2d 311 (1940)
 

IN RE SCHOMMER

No. 7234.

112 F.2d 311 (1940)

In re SCHOMMER et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

May 21, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles P. Schwartz, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioners.

Tenney, Harding, Sherman & Rogers, Wilson & McIlvaine, Gottlieb & Schwartz, Johnstone, Peters & Dixon, John W. Kearns, David O. Dunbar, Alden, Latham & Young, Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, Edwin H. Cassels, David O. Dunbar, Campbell, Clark & Miller, Pam, Hurd & Reichmann, and Poppenhusen, Johnston, Thompson & Raymond, all of Chicago, Ill. (William J. Friedman, Henry F. Tenney, J. F. Dammann, John W. Kearns, and Carl R. Latham, all of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for respondent.

William J. Froelich, of Chicago, Ill. (Thomas Dodd Healy, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for Walter A. Shaw.

Before SPARKS, MAJOR, and TREANOR, Circuit Judges.

MAJOR, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition for mandamus, to require respondent, as Judge of the District Court of the Northern District of Illinois, to permit petitioners to intervene in certain consolidated suits there pending for the reorganization of the property of the Chicago Railways Company, Chicago City Railway Company et al., and for foreclosure of mortgages on the property involved — respondent having denied leave to intervene. The petition submitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases