1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 37 F.Supp.
  5. 37 F.Supp. 375 (1940)
 

RIPPERGER v. SCHRODER-ROCKEFELLER & CO.

37 F.Supp. 375 (1940)

RIPPERGER v. SCHRODER-ROCKEFELLER & CO., Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

November 15, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacob K. Javits and Percival E. Jackson, both of New York City, for plaintiff.

Sullivan & Cromwell, of New York City (John C. Bruton, Jr., of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

LEIBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss an amended complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, Rule 12 (b) (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; in the alternative, for a more definite statement of the cause of action or a bill of particulars, Rule 12 (e), F.R.C.P.

In an opinion dated May 1, 1940, 37 F.Supp. 373

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases