1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 34 F.Supp.
  5. 34 F.Supp. 377 (1940)
 

BURGESS BATTERY CO. v. COE

Civil No. 302.

34 F.Supp. 377 (1940)

BURGESS BATTERY CO. v. COE, Com'r of Patents.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

August 14, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarence M. Fisher, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

W. W. Cochran and Edward T. Newton, of U. S. Patent Office, both of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

MORRIS, Justice.

This is a proceeding instituted under the provisions of Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63. Henry W. Porth, on February 4, 1936, filed an application, designated as Serial No. 62,302, in the Patent Office of the United States for letters patent, relating to closures for dry cell batteries, containing a socket connection for attaching a pronged plug connection. The sockets are embedded in flexible or pliant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases