1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 33 F.Supp.
  5. 33 F.Supp. 344 (1940)
 

GOTHAM SILK HOSIERY CO. v. ARTCRAFT SILK HOSIERY MILLS

No. 910.

33 F.Supp. 344 (1940)

GOTHAM SILK HOSIERY CO., Inc., v. ARTCRAFT SILK HOSIERY MILLS, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware.

May 22, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel E. Darby, Jr. (of Darby & Darby), and Abraham I. Spiro, both of New York City, and Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Sylvan Hirsch (of Sundheim, Folz & Hirsch), of Philadelphia, Pa., Clifton V. Edwards (of Edwards, Bower & Pool), of New York City, Leon Edelson, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Richards, Layton & Finger, of Wilmington, Del., for defendant.

NIELDS, District Judge.

Exceptions to report of special master.

In Gotham Silk Hosiery Company, Inc. v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc., D.C., 1 F.Supp. 643, this court held Tilles U. S. Patent No. 1,824,636 for "Hosiery" valid and infringed. The decision of this court was affirmed, 3 Cir., 72 F.2d 47. Thereafter this cause was referred to a special master "to take and state an account...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases