1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 110 F.2d
  5. 110 F.2d 264 (1940)
 

COLGATE PALMOLIVE PEET CO. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 7321.

110 F.2d 264 (1940)

COLGATE PALMOLIVE PEET CO. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided January 15, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seth W. Richardson, Raymond N. Beebe, Adrien F. Busick, and Raymond C. Cushwa, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Elwood H. Seal, Corp. Counsel, Vernon E. West, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Glenn Simmon, Asst. Corp. Counsel, all of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and STEPHENS, MILLER, EDGERTON, and VINSON, Associate Justices.

MILLER, Associate Justice.

This case involves, as did Nos. 7213,1 7319,2 and 7320,3 all decided this day, the District of Columbia business privilege tax statute approved August 17, 1937.4 In addition to the questions considered and decided in No. 7213, Neild and Sauerhoff v. District of Columbia,5 a further question is here...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases