1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 111 F.2d
  5. 111 F.2d 239 (1940)
 

CINCINNATI RUBBER MFG. CO. v. STOWE-WOODWARD, INC.

No. 8212.

111 F.2d 239 (1940)

CINCINNATI RUBBER MFG. CO. v. STOWE-WOODWARD, INC.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 12, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Zugelter, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Arthur C. Denison, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Frank Zugelter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Frank H. Stewart and L. G. Miller, both of Boston, Mass., for appellee.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ARANT, Circuit Judges.

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Stowe-Woodward, Inc., appellee, sued The Cincinnati Rubber Manufacturing Company, appellant, for infringement of Claims 1, 2 and 7 of Woodward Reissue Patent No. 18,111, June 23, 1931. The District Court held the claims valid and infringed. The defenses relied upon here are: Lack of invention; non-infringement; anticipation; and invalidity, for ineffectiveness of the disclaimer, and of the reissue.

The patent is for a "roll" and is in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases