1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 111 F.2d
  5. 111 F.2d 209 (1940)
 

EMERY INDUSTRIES v. SCHUMANN

No. 7095.

111 F.2d 209 (1940)

EMERY INDUSTRIES, Inc., v. SCHUMANN et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Rehearing Denied May 3, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry M. Huxley and Ralph Munden, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellants.

Edmund P. Wood and Edward B. Evans, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Russell Wiles, George A. Chritton and Chritton, Wiles, Davies, Hirschl & Dawson, all of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

Before EVANS, MAJOR, and KERNER, Circuit Judges.

The District Court held three claims of two patents in the dry cleaning art, valid and infringed. Claims 1 and 6 of Reddish Patent No. 1,911,289, covering a "Method of Cleaning Fabrics," issued May 30, 1933, on an application filed February 4, 1932, and claim 2 of Reddish Patent No. 2,024,981, covering an "Absorbefacient for Dry-Cleaning," issued December 17, 1935, on a continuation of the application filed October 31, 1930, were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases