1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 111 F.2d
  5. 111 F.2d 181 (1940)
 

IN RE FORSTROM

Patent Appeal No. 4291.

111 F.2d 181 (1940)

In re FORSTROM.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 29, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry E. Dunham, of Schenectady, N. Y. (F. Gerald Toye, of Washington, D. C., and Ralph Hammar, of Schenectady, N. Y., of counsel), for appellant.

Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.

Before BLAND, Acting Presiding Judge, and HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting, for lack of patentability over the cited prior art, claims 4 and 10 to 14, inclusive, of appellant's application for a patent. Claims 12 and 13 were also rejected as being drawn to aggregations.

After appellant's appeal from the decision of the examiner was taken, appellant proposed an amendment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases