1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 32 F.Supp.
  5. 32 F.Supp. 247 (1940)
 

THE WILJA

No. A-15786.

32 F.Supp. 247 (1940)

THE WILJA. LOUIS DREYFUS et al. v. O/Y WIPU.

District Court, E. D. New York.

Reargument Denied February 7, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otto & Easterday, of New York City (Henry E. Otto and Samuel C. Otto, both of New York City, of counsel), for libelants.

Haight, Griffin, Deming & Gardner, of New York City (Herbert M. Statt and James McKown, Jr., both of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

The respondent has appeared specially herein and made a motion for an order that the Court decline to take jurisdiction, that the libel be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and that the libel be dismissed on the ground that it does not allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

According to the libel Louis Louis Dreyfus, Jean Louis Dreyfus, Pierre Louis Dreyfus and Francois Louis Dreyfus are copartners doing business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases