STANDARD MAILING MACHINES CO. v. DITTO

No. 4331.

35 F.Supp. 228 (1940)

STANDARD MAILING MACHINES CO. v. DITTO, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

September 13, 1940.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George P. Dike, Cedric W. Porter, and George P. Towle, Jr. (of Dike, Calver & Gray) all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Irving U. Townsend, Jr. (of Emery, Booth, Townsend, Miller & Weidner), of Boston, Mass., and Max W. Zabel and Arthur W. Carlson (of Zabel, Carlson & Wells), both of Chicago, Ill., for defendant.


SWEENEY, District Judge.

There are three motions before me, the first of which is for an order on the defendant to show cause why it should not be attached and punished for contempt in the violation of an order of the Master in this proceeding. The decision on this motion will be withheld. The question of an issuance of an order is left open until some future date if the plaintiff desires to press it. It will be decided then.

The next is the plaintiff's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases