1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 37 F.Supp.
  5. 37 F.Supp. 100 (1940)
 

KUHN v. PACIFIC MUT. LIFE INS. CO. OF CALIFORNIA

37 F.Supp. 100 (1940)

KUHN v. PACIFIC MUT. LIFE INS. CO. OF CALIFORNIA et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

October 18, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davidson & Davidson, of New York City (Louis B. Davidson, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Katz & Sommerich, of New York City (Henry I. Fillman, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

HULBERT, District Judge.

There are four motions: (1) to require plaintiff to separately state and number each claim or count in his complaint (Rule 10(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c); (2) for a bill of particulars (Rule 12(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); (3) to remand, for lack of jurisdiction; and (4) vacating an order giving the defendants additional time to answer.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases