1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 31 F.Supp.
  5. 31 F.Supp. 84 (1940)
 

BACHRACH v. GENERAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION

31 F.Supp. 84 (1940)

BACHRACH et al. v. GENERAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

January 23, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Javits & Javits, of New York City (Jacob K. Javits, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Milbank, Tweed & Hope, of New York City (A. Donald MacKinnon and Carleton H. Endemann, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendants Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York and Chase Bank.

HULBERT, District Judge.

The defendants Chase National Bank of the City of New York and The Chase Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary, move upon affidavit for an order pursuant to Rule 30, F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, that the depositions of said defendants and Joseph C. Rovensky, a vice president of The Chase Bank, pursuant to separate notices served under Rule 26, shall not be taken, or, in the alternative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases