IN RE CADY

Patent Appeals No. 4343.

111 F.2d 899 (1940)

In re CADY.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 29, 1940.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio (Watts T. Estabrook, of Washington, D. C., and W. E. Williams, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for appellant.

Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


BLAND, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the examiner in denying all the claims in appellant's application — 6 and 9 — upon the ground that they did not patentably distinguish from the issue of an interference to which applicant was a party. Claim 6 is illustrative and follows: "6. A valve stem comprising a body of molded material, a nipple projecting from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases