BACHRACH v. GENERAL INV. CORPORATION


29 F.Supp. 966 (1939)

BACHRACH et al. v. GENERAL INV. CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

November 2, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Javits & Javits, of New York City (Jacob K. Javits and Emanuel Becker, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Seibert & Riggs, of New York City, for defendants Seagrave and Glines.

Mudge, Stern, Williams & Tucker, of New York City, for defendants Amerex, Trinway and Hines.

Milbank, Tweed & Hope, of New York City, for defendants Chase Nat. Bank and The Chase Bank.

Parker & Duryee, of New York City, for defendant Devendorf.

Satterlee & Canfield, of New York City, for defendant American General Corporation.

Sullivan & Cromwell, of New York City, for defendants Woods, Addinsell, Granbery, Wheaton and Crispell.


CONGER, District Judge.

Arthur L. Cole and Milford H. Whitehill apply for leave to intervene in this action as parties plaintiffs.

This is a stockholders derivative action brought in May, 1937, by the two present plaintiffs, Walter K. Bachrach and Frank A. Woodhead, for the benefit of the General Investment Corporation against certain of its former officers and directors, individuals and corporations associated with them, for an accounting for assets diverted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases