1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 26 F.Supp.
  5. 26 F.Supp. 959 (1939)
 

MICHELS v. RIPLEY

26 F.Supp. 959 (1939)

MICHELS v. RIPLEY.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 8, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin M. Slote, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Phillips, Mahoney & Fielding, of New York City (William E. Goldman, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

HULBERT, District Judge.

Defendant, after issue joined, served a demand for a bill of particulars in accordance with Rule 115(a), New York Civil Practice Act, which reads as follows: "(a) Any party may require any other party to give a bill of particulars of his claim, or a copy of the items of the account alleged in a pleading, by serving a written notice stating the items concerning which such particulars are desired. If the party upon whom such notice is served...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases