1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 102 F.2d
  5. 102 F.2d 853 (1939)
 

IN RE MADGE

Patent Appeal No. 4124.

102 F.2d 853 (1939)

In re MADGE et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 10, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph H. Milans, of Washington, D. C. (Benj. T. Rauber, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This appeal brings before us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting, in view of the cited prior art, all of the claims of appellants' application for a patent.

There are seven claims; claim 1 is illustrative of the involved claims and reads as follows: "1. An improved process for the manufacture of fabric coated with waterproof compositions of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases