1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 28 F.Supp.
  5. 28 F.Supp. 67 (1939)
 

SATINK v. HOLLAND TP.

No. 208.

28 F.Supp. 67 (1939)

SATINK v. HOLLAND TP. et al.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

June 9, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Collins & Corbin and Charles W. Broadhurst, all of Jersey City, N. J., for plaintiff.

Gebhardt & Gebhardt and Philip R. Gebhardt, all of Clinton, N. J., for defendant Hunterdon County.

John A. Hartpence, of Jersey City, N. J., for defendant Holland Tp.

FORMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a resident of New York, alleges that defendants, residents of New Jersey, either jointly or severally constructed and maintained a highway which traversed an existing railroad track operated and maintained by the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company at a point existing on a downhill grade, and that the downhill rail of the track was elevated one inch above its parallel rail by virtue of a curve in the

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases