1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 102 F.2d
  5. 102 F.2d 849 (1939)
 

IN RE HOOVER

Patent Appeal No. 4125.

102 F.2d 849 (1939)

In re HOOVER.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 10, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ely & Frye, of Akron, Ohio (Albert L. Ely and Bernard C. Frye, both of Akron, Ohio, of counsel), for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.

JACKSON, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the examiner rejecting, in view of the prior art, all of the claims, 14 and 15, of an application for a patent alleging certain new and useful improvements in Traction Wheel and Method.

The claims are as follows:

"14. A traction wheel comprising a resilient flexible walled tire having therein a single, circumferentially...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases