1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 27 F.Supp.
  5. 27 F.Supp. 904 (1939)
 

UNGAR v. HIGGINS

27 F.Supp. 904 (1939)

UNGAR v. HIGGINS, Collector of Internal Revenue, et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 23, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl Mager, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Gregory F. Noonan, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Myles J. Lane, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

COXE, District Judge.

I think it is too clear even for argument that this complaint does not state a cause of action against the Collector. The plaintiff is a mere judgment creditor of the taxpayer, and in no position to challenge the seizure. I do not believe, either, that the plaintiff has any standing to maintain a suit to recover taxes erroneously collected from a third party.

The motion of the defendant to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases