1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 31 F.Supp.
  5. 31 F.Supp. 844 (1939)
 

WRIGHT v. RUNGE

No. 67095.

31 F.Supp. 844 (1939)

WRIGHT v. RUNGE et al.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

December 12, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. L. Godfrey and T. Hayward Brown, Department of justice, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Richard A. Ford and Chester L. Davis, both of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

BAILEY, Justice.

At the beginning of the hearing of this case, counsel for the defendants conceded that the plaintiff was entitled to a date in 1931 as a date of conception. At the conclusion of the testimony he also conceded that the new evidence offered by the plaintiff established a reduction to practice before October 12, 1932, the earliest date claimed by the defendant.

The introduction by the plaintiff of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases