1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 104 F.2d
  5. 104 F.2d 749 (1939)
 

UNIVIS CORPORATION v. RIPS

Nos. 7594, 7595.

104 F.2d 749 (1939)

UNIVIS CORPORATION et al. v. RIPS et al. SAME v. GRIMSHAW.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 3, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. A. Toulmin, Jr., of Dayton, Ohio (H. A. Toulmin and H. A. Toulmin, Jr., both of Dayton, Ohio, and Ralph Routier, of Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellants.

Victor D. Borst, of New York City, and Otto F. Barthel, of Detroit, Mich. (Victor D. Borst, of New York City, and Otto F. Barthel, of Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellees.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Separate suits by appellants against Paul Rips and Rips Optical Company and against Charlotte M. Grimshaw, an employee of Rips, for infringement of Patents No. 1,899,777 issued February 28, 1933, to Stanley; and No. 1,912,165 issued May 30, 1933, to Silverman.

Infringement is conceded. The District Court found both patents invalid for want of invention. The cases are here on one record. All claims of both patents are in issue.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases