1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 27 F.Supp.
  5. 27 F.Supp. 811 (1939)
 

LIP LURE, INC. v. BLOOMINGDALE BROS.

27 F.Supp. 811 (1939)

LIP LURE, Inc., v. BLOOMINGDALE BROS., Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 4, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard S. Neiman, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City, for defendants.

CONGER, District Judge.

The plaintiff, by this motion, seeks to examine, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, the defendants, and to compel them to produce and permit inspection, etc., of documents, etc., regarding: "5. The maintenance of the defense of this suit by the manufacturer of said Princess Pat Cosmetics". Neither Princess Pat Cosmetics nor Princess Pat Ltd. is a party to this action.

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases