1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 101 F.2d
  5. 101 F.2d 718 (1939)
 

HELEN ARDELLE, INC. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

No. 8842.

101 F.2d 718 (1939)

HELEN ARDELLE, Inc., et al. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 14, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Flood, Lenihan & Ivers, of Seattle, Wash., for petitioners.

W. T. Kelley, Chief Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, Martin A. Morrison, Asst. Chief Counsel, and P. C. Kolinski, James W. Nichol, and Daniel J. Murphy, Sp. Attys., all of the Federal Trade Commission, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Five Washington corporations — Helen Ardelle, Incorporated, Brown & Haley, Canterbury Candy Makers, Incorporated. Imperial Candy Company and Rogers Candy Company — have petitioned this court to review and set aside orders of the Federal Trade Commission requiring them to cease and desist from certain practices which, the Commission holds, constitute an unfair method of competition in commerce, within the meaning of §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases