IN RE HARRIMAN


31 F.Supp. 50 (1939)

In re HARRIMAN.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 14, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Garey & Garey, of New York City, for petitioning creditors.

Harold S. Glendening, of New York City (Mathias F. Correa, of New York City, of counsel), for alleged bankrupt.

Conboy, Hewitt, O'Brien & Boardman, of New York City (Bernard Sobol and Hobart L. Brinsmade, both of New York City, of counsel), for receiver of Harriman Nat. Bank & Trust Co., creditor.

Morris Ehrlich, of New York City, for Milton I. Hauser, creditor.

Lamar Hardy, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Irving C. Rutter, of New York City, of counsel), for Collector of Internal Revenue.


HULBERT, District Judge.

This proceeding was instituted on February 16, 1938, by the filing of an involuntary petition which was subsequently dismissed on motion. Thereafter, an amended petition was presented April 8, 1938, filed nunc pro tunc as of the date of filing the original petition.

The act of bankruptcy alleged is that on October 18, 1937, Frederick V. Goess, as receiver of the Harriman National Bank and Trust Company of the City of New York, commenced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases