1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 30 F.Supp.
  5. 30 F.Supp. 760 (1939)
 

COMOLITE CORPORATION v. DAVIDOWITZ

30 F.Supp. 760 (1939)

COMOLITE CORPORATION v. DAVIDOWITZ et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Reargument Denied December 2, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brown & Jones, of New York City (Donald L. Brown, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Bobick & Warshawsky, of New York City (Abraham Buchman, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

Richard Eyre, of New York City, for defendants on motion for reargument.

COXE, District Judge.

This is a suit for alleged infringement of the Brown patent, No. 1,508,504, issued September 16, 1924, for a heel for boots and shoes, and the Gugger & Barentzen patent, No. 1,988,242, issued Jan. 15, 1935, for an artificial wood composition and method of making the same.

The patents are owned by the plaintiff, which is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling composition shoe...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases