1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 27 F.Supp.
  5. 27 F.Supp. 737 (1939)
 

STEINFUR PATENTS CORP. v. MEISEL-GALLAND CO., INC.

Nos. 4941, 6512.

27 F.Supp. 737 (1939)

STEINFUR PATENTS CORPORATION v. MEISEL-GALLAND CO., Inc., et al. SAME v. MICHAEL MILLER FUR DYEING CORPORATION et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

May 22, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abel E. Blackmar, Jr., of New York City, special master.

Lemlein & Wolsky, of New York City (Morris H. Wolsky, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Louis H. Solomon, of New York City, for defendants William E. Popkin and Michael Miller.

BYERS, District Judge.

Hearing on exceptions to report and findings made by Special Master to whom was referred the question of alleged violation of injunction and infringement by the individual defendants, William E. Popkin in the first cause and Michael Miller in the second.

The Special Master has found infringement as follows:

As to Popkin: Patent No. 1,573,200 (Process) at least as to claims 6, 7, 19, and 22. Patent No. 1,564,378 (Product) at least...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases