GANTZ v. NATIONAL CASUALTY CO.

No. 243.

29 F.Supp. 41 (1939)

GANTZ v. NATIONAL CASUALTY CO.

District Court, E. D. New York.

August 22, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otho S. Bowling, of New York City, for the motion.

Max Tirschwell, of New York City, opposed.


CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion for judgment on the pleadings consisting of the amended complaint and answer.

The answer asserts the defense that the Court does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter.

Rule 12 (b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts of the United States, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, reads as follows:

"(b) How Presented. Every defense, in law or fact, to a claim for relief in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases