1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 31 F.Supp.
  5. 31 F.Supp. 24 (1939)
 

DURBIN v. BENNETT

No. 52-D.

31 F.Supp. 24 (1939)

DURBIN et al. v. BENNETT et al.

District Court, E. D. Illinois.

September 22, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith & Murray, of Centralia, Ill., for plaintiff.

Acton, Acton & Baldwin, of Danville, Ill., Burnside & Burnside, of Vandalia, Ill., R. E. Ausmus, of Centralia, Mo., and L. M. Price, of Columbia, Mo., for defendants.

LINDLEY, District Judge.

The correct answer to the contested issue in this case lies in the legal effect of two mineral deeds executed by William Durbin and his daughter; one for 121 acres to Bennett and the other for 40 acres to Chance.

On September 16, 1936, William Durbin was the owner of record of each of the tracts involved. He had previously executed and delivered to his daughter, Florence May, deeds for each of them, as well as certain other land, but...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases