1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 29 F.Supp.
  5. 29 F.Supp. 506 (1939)
 

FLUXGOLD v. UNITED STATES LINES CO.

29 F.Supp. 506 (1939)

FLUXGOLD v. UNITED STATES LINES CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

October 5, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacob Rassner, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating & McGrann, of New York City, for defendant.

COXE, District Judge.

The only difference between this motion and the one under consideration in Kenealy v. Texas Company, D.C., 29 F.Supp. 502, is that the defendant here objects to an additional item which was not contested in the Kenealy case. This item asks for the production for inspection of Item 2. "All statements of the captain or any other officer aboard the vessel as to the accident".

These statements are open...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases