1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 27 F.Supp.
  5. 27 F.Supp. 499 (1939)
 

UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORP. v. ATLAS TACK CORP.

27 F.Supp. 499 (1939)

UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION v. ATLAS TACK CORPORATION.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 3, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blair, Curtis, Dunne & Hayward, of New York City (Edward G. Curtis, of New York City, Victor Cobb and Walter P. Abell, both of Boston, Mass., and Charles C. Ladd, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

William L. Bainton, of New York City, (H. A. Baker and A. B. Bagley, both of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for defendant.

HULBERT, District Judge.

This is a patent suit to enjoin defendant and recover damages for alleged infringement of two United States Letters Patent, both issued to Sylvester Leo Gookin, March 4, 1930.

The alleged inventions relate to an improved shoe lacing device particularly adapted to invisible eyeleting and a method of inserting same in shoe uppers.

Plaintiff relies upon the following claims:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases