MABARDY v. RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY

No. 7237.

26 F.Supp. 25 (1939)

MABARDY v. RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

January 17, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis Juggins, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Austin M. Pinkham, of Boston, Mass., for defendant.


McLELLAN, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 56 of the federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the defendant moves for summary judgment. The arguments upon the motion, which is supported by an affidavit, were heard today.

At the outset it should be stated that no attempt is here made to determine what the alleged defense should be called. It is unnecessary to decide whether to call it res judicata or estoppel by judgment. See Cromwell...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases