MURPHY v. CADY


30 F.Supp. 466 (1939)

MURPHY v. CADY et al.

District Court, D. Maine, S. D.

December 11, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan W. Thompson and Richard S. Chapman, both of Portland, Me., for plaintiff.

Richard Wait, of Boston, Mass., and Verrill, Hale, Dana & Walker, of Portland, Me. (Robert Hale, of Portland Me., of counsel), for defendants.


PETERS, District Judge.

The plaintiff is a small securities broker in Portland. The defendants, fifteen in number, constitute a brokerage firm in Boston with which the plaintiff did most of his purchasing business for several years.

The writ, dated October 6, 1937, after amendment, contains four counts; three under the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. A. § 77a et seq., and one a common law count for deceit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases