A. F. HAMACEK CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES

No. K-185.

26 F.Supp. 467 (1939)

A. F. HAMACEK MARINE CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

March 6, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry C. Bierman, of New York City (Hyman M. Goldstein, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff.

Alexander Holtzoff, of Washington, D. C., and Sam E. Whitaker, Asst. Atty. Gen. (C. Hugh Duffy, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for the United States.

Before BOOTH, Chief Justice, and GREEN, LITTLETON, WILLIAMS, and WHALEY, Judges.


LITTLETON, Judge.

In view of the facts established by the record in this case, the stated object of the invention, and the description of its construction as set forth in the patent in suit, we are of opinion that plaintiff is not entitled to recover. The essential facts established by the record are set forth in the findings. Plaintiff takes exceptions to certain of the findings and has proposed eighty-two additional findings. Upon consideration of these exceptions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases