1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 27 F.Supp.
  5. 27 F.Supp. 443 (1939)
 

SCHWARTZ v. HOWARD HOSIERY CO.

No. 117.

27 F.Supp. 443 (1939)

SCHWARTZ et al. v. HOWARD HOSIERY CO.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 15, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis Marcus, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Henry E. Stauffer, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Louis Necho, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

In this suit for patent infringement the defendant has filed interrogatories under Rule 33, Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c. The plaintiff has answered four of them and objects to the others.

The patent is for a method of knitting, intended to produce stockings which will not develop runs. The fifth claim is for the fabric produced, but I am accepting the plaintiff's view that it is not essentially...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases