1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 107 F.2d
  5. 107 F.2d 350 (1939)
 

BALDWIN RUBBER CO. v. PAINE & WILLIAMS CO.

No. 8124.

107 F.2d 350 (1939)

BALDWIN RUBBER CO. v. PAINE & WILLIAMS CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

November 15, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George I. Haight, of Chicago, Ill. (Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust & Bills and Whittemore, Hulbert & Belknap, all of Detroit, Mich., George I. Haight, of Chicago, Ill., and Rockwell T. Gust and Clarence B. Zewadski, both of Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellant.

John F. Oberlin and Howard F. Burns, both of Cleveland, Ohio (Beaumont, Smith & Harris, of Detroit, Mich., and Jno. F. Oberlin, Howard F. Burns, and John Adams, all of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

The appellant-licensee, the Baldwin Rubber Company, appeals from a judgment of $101,491.54, in favor of appellee-licensor, The Paine & Williams Company, for royalties alleged to be due on the manufacture of automobile rubber floor covering and methods of, and apparatus for, making such coverings. The issues are whether the product manufactured and sold by appellee was covered by the license and whether the license is void because of price...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases