1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 109 F.2d
  5. 109 F.2d 345 (1939)
 

ARLINGTON & FAIRFAX AUTO R. CO. v. CAPITAL TRANSIT CO.

No. 7357.

109 F.2d 345 (1939)

ARLINGTON & FAIRFAX AUTO R. CO. v. CAPITAL TRANSIT CO. et al.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided September 18, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund D. Campbell, Stuart T. Saunders, and F. K. Lane, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Elwood H. Seal, Corp. Counsel, Vernon E. West, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, Lloyd B. Harrison, Sp. Asst. Corp. Counsel, and G. Thomas Dunlop and S. R. Bowen, all of Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and MILLER and RUTLEDGE, Associate Justices.

PER CURIAM.

This was an appeal from a judgment enjoining appellant railroad company from inaugurating passenger service into the District of Columbia. In our 1938 term the identical controversy was before us in United States ex rel. Arlington & F. Auto R. Co. v. Elgen, 68 App.D.C. 392, 98 F.2d 264. We then affirmed a decision of the District Court denying a writ of mandamus to compel the Public Utilities Commission of the District...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases