1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 27 F.Supp.
  5. 27 F.Supp. 399 (1939)
 

BUGGELN & SMITH v. STANDARD BRANDS

27 F.Supp. 399 (1939)

BUGGELN & SMITH, Inc., v. STANDARD BRANDS, Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 7, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fogarty, Ramey & Moynihan, of New York City (Deane Ramey, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed, of New York City (Russel S. Coutant, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

HULBERT, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to file nunc pro tunc a demand for a jury trial.

The action is to recover damages and was commenced November 3, 1938. Issue was joined by the service of an answer on December 31, 1938. It contained no counterclaim and the pleadings were, therefore, closed.

Plaintiff assumed the right to amend as of course within 20 days and defendant appears to have accepted the amended complaint without objection and served...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases