1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 104 F.2d
  5. 104 F.2d 302 (1939)
 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. HOPWOOD RETINNING CO.

104 F.2d 302 (1939)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. HOPWOOD RETINNING CO., Inc., et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 6, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, of Washington, D. C., for National Labor Relations Board.

Daniel J. Byrne, of Ridgewood, N. Y., for respondents Hopwood Retinning Co., Inc., and John A. Hopwood.

Milton M. Siegel, of New York City (Kotzen, Mann & Siegel, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent Monarch Retinning Co., Inc.

Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

This is a motion by the National Labor Relations Board that the respondents be adjudged in contempt of this court for their failure to comply with its order dated July 26, 1938, wherein enforcement of an order of the Labor Board made with respect to the parties hereto was directed, pursuant to an opinion rendered July 12, 1938. The opinion is reported in National Labor Relations Board v. Hopwood Retinning Co., Inc., et al., 2 Cir.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases