MURPHY v. PUGET SOUND MORTG. CO.

No. 21195.

31 F.Supp. 318 (1939)

MURPHY v. PUGET SOUND MORTG. CO. et al.

District Court, W. D. Washington, N. D.

June 5, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nina D. Murphy, plaintiff pro se.

Byers, Westberg & James, Allen, Froude & Hilen, and Roy D. Robinson, all of Seattle, Wash., for defendants (respondents).


CUSHMAN, District Judge.

No doubt, owing to the fact that the plaintiff has acted as her own attorney, the Amended Complaint is wanting in clarity and precision, but whether the Court considers alone the sufficiency of plaintiff's pleading entitled "Amended Complaint" or considers as part of plaintiff's Amended Complaint, the accompanying 3 pages entitled "History", six pages entitled "Statement of Facts" and 3 pages entitled "Statement of Facts Attacking Legality...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases