1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 31 F.Supp.
  5. 31 F.Supp. 296 (1939)
 

DYSART v. REMINGTON RAND, INC.

Nos. 3978, 3979.

31 F.Supp. 296 (1939)

DYSART et al. v. REMINGTON RAND, Inc. DYSART v. SAME.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

December 29, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert P. Butler, of Hartford, Conn., for plaintiffs.

George H. Cohen, of Hartford, Conn., for defendant.

HINCKS, District Judge.

These are two companion actions, to the complaint in each of which an answer has been filed comprising as a first defense a general denial and as defenses second to thirteenth various affirmative defenses coupled with a general denial. To the answer in each case the plaintiff has addresssed a motion denominated "Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings". However, the substance of the motion makes it clear that what the plaintiff seeks is a ruling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases