1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 101 F.2d
  5. 101 F.2d 224 (1939)
 

WALSH v. DAVIDSON

Patent Appeals Nos. 4028, 4030, 4031.

101 F.2d 224 (1939)

WALSH et al. v. DAVIDSON et al. DAVIDSON v. WALSH et al. (two cases).

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

January 23, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. Seltzer and C. W. Levinson, both of New York City, for Walsh and Caprio.

Eugene L. Greenewald and Emory P. Boynton, both of New York City (Rudolph S. Nelson, of New York City, of counsel), for Davidson.

Warren J. Willis, of New York City, for Ostromislensky.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

These are appeals in interference proceedings from the decisions of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decisions of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellee Iwan Ostromislensky in interference No. 65,251, and to appellees James F. Walsh and Amerigo F. Caprio in interference No. 63,781.

Interference No. 65,251 involves three parties. The two unsuccessful parties in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases